As a Northern Irishman, I can confirm this.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or the same interest, in the case of both Crusaders and Saracens wanting the Holy Land.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Of course. People are... strange.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Or the same interests by different statuses or different opportunities to pursue those interests.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but even then religion isn't a pure epiphenomenon. Religious affiliation helps determining who ends up on which side in the conflict. Cf Descioli and Kurzban, citing Gellner. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228099278_A_Solution_to_the_Mysteries_of_Morality …pic.twitter.com/RAvwoYpUZN
-
It is more complex, let's use the Spanish Reconquista as example. Christian Kings fight between them, sometimes sided with Moorish taifas. other times, Taifas allied with the Christians against the Almoravids from Maghreb. Balance of power and short term gains were the driver.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bitcoin vs Ethereum
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
make it easier: wars are Us vs Them. It doesn't really matter what determines who falls in each group as long as it's easy to know which one you and others belong to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politics is short term religion and religion is long term politics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.