What's the most optimal first step?
Building a Center for X is popular with people who want to seem like they're doing x, but it's rarely the optimal first step to actually doing x. Get to work now, and only build the center when the lack of it is the main thing holding you back.
-
-
-
Action
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The people doing x often wonder why the people building a Center for X have never worked on x.
-
That’s a good truth arrow
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thats how Govt operates is our country. Build a big ass center for doing X, rarely anyone actually builds.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worse - when there are already multiple orgs within an org doing X sub-optimally, and one is designated "Center of Excellence for X"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Public funds going to the Center for x simply looks better in itemized budgets than them going to some guy who works on x.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow. This is brilliant advice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most people building Center for x are in “Build it and they will come” mindset
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A “building for X” has too often been the maskirova for yet another real state development “investment”, with clear short-term gains for the promoters, capturing funding opportunity costs away from executing the X project. When the building is the focus, that’s a major red flag.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.