You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
We take for granted censorship of movies and TV shows that we'd be shocked at in books. Do we give books a pass because they're the way the elite communicate? Or are books ignored because the audience is so much smaller? Probably some of both.
Imagine if, for example, the National Book Awards announced that a novel couldn't win unless it contained certain types of characters. It would seem pretty shocking. And yet when the Oscars impose such restrictions it seems par for the course.
I was thinking it's mainly because of the audience size. but that specific comparison made me realise it's probably also because in movies and TV shows, characters are played by real people. In books, they are all imaginary.
Neither would be censorship. It would be private organisations codifying a preference.
Are they any awards given to Literotica ?
Books are sorted by genre, though. You can't win a poetry prize with a novel, or win a translation prize if the original is in English. But movies are, in part, defined by the actors who participate - making it at least a bit more reasonable than your analogy implies.
Oh don’t worry, that’s next.
May be censorship inversely proportional to no. Of product available in market. Since no. Of Books are much higher than film or TV show .
I think it's a stretch to think that folks think that it's par for the course. It's ludicrous and have seen most say the same.
Wish there was a Netflix for books.
Kindle Unlimited
I was under impression that the Oscars decision was to help POC get acting jobs. Book characters don't need to pay bills ;-)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
