A serious non-troll question. Have you reflected/written up your feelings on the ways tech has gone wrong (define that as you like) over the period of YC, why, and how you figure in that? Because people care now, smile less, and not without reason.
-
-
Replying to @librarythingtim
I don't think it has gone wrong so much as that when you become successful you attract a lot of carpetbaggers and haters. When someone talked about startups in 2005, it was because they cared about startups. But you can't assume that in 2020.
3 replies 11 retweets 156 likes -
Replying to @paulg
No, I mean how tech went wrong. How startup culture, the focus and the logic of tech startup success created serious social problems that we're suffering from today. I could expand on my feelings there, but I'd rather find out what you think.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @librarythingtim
The main problem that comes to mind is polarization. The internet lets each person find what they want to believe. But that's not a byproduct of startup culture.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @paulg
I think there's something in assembling smart, super-young, culturally similar people with no background in anything else, and encouraging them to focus on growth above all. As S. Levy notes, the pathologies of FB today are the result of decisions made in early, startup days.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @librarythingtim
Historically that has been the recipe for a lot of great achievements. It's not specific to startups. It just as accurately describes Xerox PARC, the Manhattan Project, and many if not most literary and artistic movements.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @paulg
So you don't think the pathologies and limitations of the tech startup world contributed anything notable to the pathologies of tech today? You are known for smart, unusual takes, but I'm surprised at that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @librarythingtim
To answer that you'd have to start by describing the "pathologies of tech" whose origins you're seeking. What are they? What, for example, is broken about Tesla that wasn't broken at Ford?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paulg
Tesla: Not much. I'd point to social first and foremost, with a less central role for sharing-economy companies.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @librarythingtim
That appears to be evidence the origin of the problems you're seeing is something other than startup culture. If startup culture caused x, you'd see it in all startups, not just those in certain domains.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
It seems a more plausible theory that the domain is the root of the problem. I.e. that the problems caused by social apps are due to their being social apps, rather than because they were startups.
-
-
Replying to @paulg @librarythingtim
My guess is that many if not most of the problems you see in Facebook, for example, would still be there if it had been started by a group at Microsoft. E.g. the use of it to influence elections. Microsoft products are not famous for being unhackable. Rather the opposite.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paulg
Okay, well, I asked if you have reflected and I guess the answer is yes you have, but that you don't think the pathologies of tech have had anything to do with the startup world and its imperatives, limitations or culture. I disagree and am amazed, but thank you for replying.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.