How much of startup success is normal people willing to have a not-normal life? As opposed to not-normal people doing 9-5? Bit of both?
-
-
Sounds like an Intensity vs Inspiration question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sounds to me like the question is how much incentive is necessary to motivate a person with normal preferences (9-5 etc) to live a "startup" life and vice versa
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looking forward to the rewording from Jokull, but interpreting it as: Is [startup] success mostly down to ordinary people doing extraordinary things, or extraordinary people doing ordinary things?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or maybe the question is: What’s the chance of building a $100m startup by working 40 hours a week vs 80 hours? My guess would be significantly lower.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No less than 100 hours per week
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How I understand it: can 'average' people succeed with a startup when they invest above-average resources (time, effort). Or is the formular for success rather: above-average people putting in rather an average amount of resources. So basically: nature vs nurture
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neither is enough. You need more than 9-5 from more-than-normal resourceful ppl. I think you already have a good answer to this q,
@paulg: Relentlessly resourceful http://www.paulgraham.com/relres.html Relentless: won't stop at 9-5 Resourceful: try more-than-normal new ways to solve thingsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
About 5.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is required of founders for success? Long sprints of productivity due to total devotion vs the intuition, experience and smartness. Can startups succeed without either? Having kids changes this formula, I think. /cc
@tobi -
I think there are examples of success in both categories but I cannot think of any examples that are in neither category except for unethical things like Ponzi schemes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.