I've got my eye on the upper peninsula of Michigan
People used to think climate change would mean you couldn't live in low-lying coastal areas. But it also means you can't live in wooded parts of California. And who knows where else.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
With rising temperatures deserts could expand
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the flip side, some places may become more livable, like Canada.
-
Buying Greenland was an underrated idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is that really climate change or "well intentioned forest fire practices gone wrong" + the natural state of California ecology? (not that imported eucalyptus trees help) Pre-1800, about 1.8 million ha burned each year in CA: https://www.sierraforestlegacy.org/Resources/Conservation/FireForestEcology/FireScienceResearch/FireHistory/FireHistory-Stephens07.pdf …pic.twitter.com/YXba1pTtri
-
"Many consider wildfire as an accelerating problem [...] however, important exceptions aside, the quantitative evidence available does not support these perceived overall trends." via https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rstb.2015.0345 … h/t
@JamesCTobiaspic.twitter.com/LL8X8POKfu
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Underground bunkers instead of log cabins may work.
-
And coastal sky scrapers may end up feeling like Venice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oregon is the new California
-
If only
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.