Ridiculous and inhuman.
"Everyone must be tested, every couple of days, with $1, paper-based, at-home tests that are as easy to distribute and use as a pregnancy test."https://harvardmagazine.com/2020/08/covid-19-test-for-public-health …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have read about this for a couple of times, and I think these guys have also done a podcast on this paper based test. But why aren't these are bein used yet ?? It it because if it's low accuracy ? Or have they failed some scientific test ? Or Government is just being stupid ??
-
FDA.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds plausible, but how sensitive is this to people refusing to test? And/or what can be done to encourage people to test as well as to respect privacy and other rights? (I'm feeling dismal and misanthropic tonight)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did SV pass on funding Theranos because mass market testing is too hard or because of the team?
-
Or because it was a Ponzi scheme?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Tests with (relatively) low sensitivity and (relatively) high number of false positive/negative results come with risks that need to be acknowledged and addressed. The ideas referred in the article fail to do that. And no, one does not simply "strip away all of that complexity”.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.