I've heard several people say that cancel culture isn't censorship, because people who get cancelled aren't prevented from speaking. This is technically correct, but only technically.
-
-
Certainly there are shades of grey here where certain expressed thoughts aren't without consequence. Wouldn't it also be important to acknowledge this and try to find common ground in the grey than write off cancelation as a whole?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But "Cancel Culture" now seems to include things like Slate Codex author Scott Alexander self-cancelling because he didn't want his name published. That's just fragility - or at least something completely different to the idea that it is an endemic problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who are examples of this? Who are the robust thinkers that are being cancelled unfairly? What are the far left political positions that moderates are being forced to adhere to at risk of censorship? I don’t see any analog to Mcarthyism at all, or much censorship either.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think there more cancellation because various communitities have a larger voice in the culture due to social media. The power of the puplit has been democratized and it makes everyone nervous because the ruleset is suddenly way more complicated. I'd argue that many of its . . .
-
excesses are due to institutions responding clumsily because they're in uncharted territory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do we understand the mechanics of cancel culture / the mechanism of cancellation? Can we hack it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.