The effect (and often the intention) of cancel culture is less to silence its immediate victims than to intimidate others with similar opinions into keeping quiet. So technically, it's exemplary punishment that induces self-censorship.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its worse than censorship tbh. Careers destroyed, lives threatened etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Authoritarian rule is easier to point to than mob rule.
-
But one doesn't negate the other, in either regard.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Like the French Revolution and Robespierre, they will end up cannibalizing themselves.
-
This is already happening.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That seems to assume that the amount of voice each person currently has is fair. If cancel culture reduces the amount of person A's voice and increases the amount of person B's voice, then how is that different from editorial culture in the past?
- Show replies
-
-
-
But cancel culture also includes deplatforming. So, there are definitely cases where it totally is censorship
-
The argument is that it's not total censorship since the banned individuals can still speak publicly through other venues
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.