A lot of debates that sell themselves as being about free speech are actually about power. And there's *a lot* of power in being able to claim, and hold, the mantle of free speech defender.
-
-
are stopped from speaking or afraid of accountability for your saying racist things?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Historically, this is true for practically every despot and dictator that ever lived.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
More generally, what some folks call "power" other folks call "status". These different words are generally associated with different moral and empirical implications, but no one seems interested in checking which theory is more accurate.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Right now, it seems one side is attempting to both steal freedom of speech and the presses, while attempting to masquerade hate-filled and violent rhetoric as free speech or simply political differences. This is dangerous territory.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Obtaining such power is often, though of course not always, the explicit goal of those who seek to suppress speech. It's always true of authoritarian regimes, but it's also often true of efforts to suppress speech on a smaller scale, in political controversies for example.
-
There's one universal rule though: when people try to gain power by suppressing speech, they never acknowledge that this is their goal. The stated goal is always to protect some thing, or some group, from the malign influence of their opponents' ideas.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.