Plus it will take some of the load off poor old correlation ≠ causation, which has borne most of the burden of aspirational analysis for the last decade at least.
Show this thread
The one good thing about the current fashion for talking about motte and bailey arguments is that everyone will finally have an accurate model of what the first castles were really like.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But we're still not going to remember which is which.
-
amused to discover that I didn't know which was which
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I keep looking up which is the motte and which is the bailey.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Also gets us to take a breath and slows down our engagement in flamewars as we go back to reconfirm which is the motte and which is the bailey.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I haven't met anyone yet IRL refer to motte and bailey. Hope that if awareness grows people will realize that's the structure of 75% of arguments they engage in.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We have arrived to the beginning of the early majoritypic.twitter.com/P4CnyQ5s7P
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.