Journalists used to have a monopoly on the news. This power bred restraint; whatever their private feelings, they avoided overt personal attacks. Now this power and the consequent restraint are both evaporating. Now they're just Twitter users.
-
-
Replying to @paulg
I doubt that power bred restraint. I think news organizations started getting their asses kicked by new, online 'journalism' which was often more clickbaity and sensational. So news orgs pivoted more to digital distribution and to this form of 'reporting' to stay alive.
4 replies 2 retweets 58 likes -
To make money in online news, you HAVE to be clickbaity. It's not a moral choice, it's a market choice. You can choose not to be clickbaity, but then the clickbaity sites will just eat your lunch.
3 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @saikatc
I know that's true as things currently stand, but I hope it's not the only way journalism can survive. I hope it's just that the full space of possibilities hasn't been explored.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Trade publications exist as premium subscriptions, and folks like
@TheAthletic essentially do that too. We also, of course, have TV news, which no one on Twitter watches. The mass-market, high quality, regional content that we had counted on is gone and isn't coming back.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe not regional, but I'd settle for (and in fact pay a lot for) national and international.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.