I don't want to prolong this argument, since everything is now cleared up, but if you insist: you (a) quote-tweeted Massimo to encourage people to attack him (b) using a false accusation. If you agree that makes you a jerk, I take back the random, and we're square.
I agree entirely that people who create works are entitled to attribution. No one is disputing that. The only point in question here is whether you should have responded in a different way – for example, by asking Massimo to credit you.
-
-
i never asked anybody to attack him? he has a responsibility to properly attribute credit, especially as a "content aggregator" account with 100k+ followers..
-
HE should be held responsible.. After calls for him to credit me he deleted the post then said STOP WITH THE ATTACKS .. when I wasn't attacking him, i just said the truth
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Where did your « false accusation » clause go all of a sudden ? There was no false accusation made by
@InertialObservr. It was : 1 - his creation 2 - attribution was editedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, people are disputing that. Massimo apologized for 'stealing content' (his quotes). Totally insincere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.