Simple rule of thumb. Don't trust anyone who wants ideas suppressed. Trusting people to be mature enough with ideas is the only way to go in a world where everyone has ten Publish buttons in their pockets.
If you make a general point about the suppression of ideas, you'll always be accused of supporting some idea that is currently being suppressed. Because there is always some idea being suppressed.
-
-
-
(Of course, this is taking as read that "ideas" is different to "abuse" or "incitement to hatred")
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lossless transmission of data is impossible scenario. Victimless events are the same, there can be no Law , or idea which doesn't oppress anybody.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if you like a tweet containing a general point about the suppression of ideas?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Happy
Thursday Paul
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actively suppressing ideas brings resentment amidst the suppressed, which works counterintuitively by making the holders if the idea more stubborn about it. Passive suppression works the best. Your ideas die when no on wants to listen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup,
@EricRWeinstein would agree.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Sometimes ideas are suppressed as part of the natural order. Not all ideas have merit or add value. For instance: flying spaghetti monsters absorb sentience on a flat Earth.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.