You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If you advocate principles like reason, due process, and free speech, you'll be attacked by extremists as if you were on the opposite side. In fact that would be a good definition of extremism: policy that can't survive exposure to reason, due process, or free speech.
You are on the opposite side, but not of the line they claim. You're not on the opposite side of the line separating them from their opponents, but of another orthogonal line separating the reasonable from the unreasonable (which includes many of their opponents as well).
It doesn’t matter to them if your views are differing from that of their opponents. They brand you a heretic for not believing in their views. Enemy’s enemy is friend doesn’t always work.
It’s a very good mental model. 
Yes - where is ‘the line’ [middle] - if the line keeps being moved, there is no point of reference to work from & things become a mess & almost meaningless
or you challenge the power they have
I think deontology vs . consequentialism (or heuristic reasoning vs. first principles reasoning) represents one of the biggest fundamental chasms we have in society. And am starting to accept it as an inevitability. There are big benefits to both ways of thinking.
Unfortunately there is no standard protocol for deontologists and consequentialists to effectively debate with each other - they are often speaking past each other. Like two alien species. The best we can do is to try to understand each other.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
