You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There was an idea being floated around. A 3 month cooling period before firing someone over ANY social media “scandal". The idea was if it wasn't important 3 months later, it probably wasn't all that important to begin with. If it was, it probably is. Your thoughts on this?
It's an interesting idea. The difficulty in practice is that when someone gets cancelled for heresy, the claim is always that they're actually being cancelled for something else.
I mean it's hard to prove that someone is hired not / hired or fired / not fired based on gender / race, but it still makes sense for that to be illegal.
Cancelling people for the classical def. of racism is a necessity of wokeness because it's harder for people to be cancelled by woke def. of racism (everything is racist, the west, capitalism are racist social constructs). You can't cancel someone for being a capitalist. Yet
I think @ScottAdamsSays came up with this idea. His timeline was a bit different, but the same logic.
Yes!! Thanks! Was looking but couldn't find the original tweet!
The main reason companies fold to the pressure is that they see reduced productivity due to internal and external conflict. That’s 3 months plus the likely second wave. Doesn’t solve the actual problem, imho.
It’s currently treated like a cancer that they can remove with a biopsy if they act quickly. The alternative is seen as slow painful chemotherapy. Though, I’ve never seen it this way. Refusal to fold to the mob builds immunity so long as a systemic problem doesn’t actually exist
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
