Politics should only decide the answers to questions that can't be answered by research. If you want a heuristic for detecting extremists (on both the far left and the far right), this could be the most effective.
-
Scientists don’t have any skin in the game (i.e. they don’t have to face consequences if wrong decisions are being made based on their data). How to reconcile that?
-
-
Sorry for lack of clarity. I guess this is what I wanted to say: 1) Scientists are responsible for delivering the data - i.e., the answers to questions. 2) Politicians are responsible for making decisions. The decision-maker is the one with the skin in the game.
-
Therefore: the one with the skin in the game will decide what are the relevant questions and answers and what to do with them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.