research is fuzzier than we'd like, but the need for policy is always urgent
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunately, people find a way to make even science serve political agendas...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure it's the deciding of the answers that's the problem - it's the execution and implementation by people who are only trained in argument and grandstanding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politicians should only make statements and decisions backed by data and research
-
So politicians will back the research that favours their position and limit the research that could have potentially negative outcomes for a policy position. Doesn't work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Research is always political.
-
Because defining apolitical research comes down to... ...politics. ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even within science there can be partisan schools of thought, eg economics. Also, generally politics talks about long term, high variate outcomes of decisions that can never be modeled in their complexity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But... the existential questions people actually care about cannot (currently) be answered by research (do people like me? is god real?, why am I here? etc.) And, more problematically, the questions that *can* be answered by research (should I wear a mask?) become political.
-
A simple (easy to grasp) question like "how high should property taxes be, if anything" is impossible to frame as apolitical. That is true for every human behaviour because you can research causal links, not which preferences should get the upper hand.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.