Slightly cynical, but maybe they dont want to save those people who dont subscribe to them.
This is a good article, @WSJ, but has it occurred to you that you could save lives by not putting it behind a paywall?https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-exactly-do-you-catch-covid-19-there-is-a-growing-consensus-11592317650 …
-
-
-
This is brilliant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They aren’t in a good number of countries
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Prioritize health over $$$. Atleast for the short term
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You got to ask yourself why there are very few Public Service Announcements (PSA) about Covid_19?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously. That's exactly what a lot of major publications have done with their Covid-19 coverage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Saving lives is not in the business model or mission statement...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.