Somewhere, I once read "I am the editor-in-chief, not the thought-policeman-in-chief." The opinions expressed by Senator Cotton were dangerous. I reject them. But to fire the editor who published a piece by a sitting US Senator, in a paper that aspires to be 'paper of record'?https://twitter.com/NYTimesPR/status/1269722985751027713 …
-
-
Editorial is different than its news section.
-
I think one problem is that as tech made it easier for anyone to record and disseminate events, newspapers had less role in recording the events and more in interpreting the events. Problem with this is the brand of objective recording is getting muddled with subjective op-eds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.