Supposed to be creativity right? But I feel like all we’ve gotten in 10 years is sneakier ad icons on the search results page.
And yet Tesla and SpaceX both seem to be extremely effective. Which makes one wonder what, if anything, is the upside of having G employees...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe what’s happening at google is a result of people not solving real problems?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Having G employees (as they are now) doesn't seem like a choice as much as a consequence of scaling the organization the way they did.
-
And TBF, they may not need the quantity and character of G employees they have to get there, but this isn't the worst place to be: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GOOGL/financials/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One upside is not having to worry that your CEO goes rogue and starts beefing with the SEC on Twitter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What are the attributes of "G employees" that are in-play here?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TSLA and SpaceX break all rules of management, questioning if they apply at all. They have insane attrition and burn people out. Some of their best do leave if they can't keep up or put up. Managers have 25 direct reports with no 1:1s.
-
Yet the most loyal ones are leaving 2X more cash elsewhere to stay. One startup advice, most cos get it -- Innovate on only one thing -- your core USP and copy everything else from the market. These cos disprove that advice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.