It may not be chance that some of the first efforts by tech companies to censor "misinformation" have gotten it wrong. This is a harder problem than most people realize. Impossibly hard, at the edges. And this is not the sort of problem where the edges don't matter.
-
-
@benedictevans has tweeted much about thisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True and false is not the only important distinction. There is also safe vs dangerous. A lie that is almost true but very dangerous is worse than a lie which is obviously false but harmless.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Misinformation" is not primarily about true or false. True information can be presented in misleading ways as misinformation, and false information may be entirely intended to be true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
unidirectionally deciding what's good and what's bad can never be good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The key is to give people the ability to make up their own mind. To untangle the mess on those edges we need technology that facilitates the emergence of shared, not correct, truth by increasing the exchange of subjective perspectives on web content. It'll be an iterative process
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The issue is that all these decisions are inheritantly political. WHO's own guidelines were not even factually accurate (they were correctly made for other reasons but communicated dishonestly due to the selfishness of the masses imo). How do you decide truth in such a case?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The filter itself is the problem. Leave the edge at the edge, but don’t try filter;https://knightcolumbia.org/content/protocols-not-platforms-a-technological-approach-to-free-speech …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you hadn't been honestly wrong for a period of time about anything you could think a computer can get the truth about subjective and contingent issues. I don't get why you think AI can be good at this.
-
Besides that sometimes AI has been good at picking politically incorrect facts and then it has to be "reeducated" to prevent "bias". Don't trust tech people to have common sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.