You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It's a trick question. If by "less" we mean "not enough", then why can't the great founder raise enough money? Isn't that part of the job, hence what would contribute to their greatness? But, if less includes enough, then there's no dilemma here: go with great.
There are at least three ways great founders might have raised less: if they chose not to raise as much, if VCs misjudged them, and if they were in a place where there wasn't as much VC to be had.
Fair, though the first implies "enough" raised and the 2nd that various (perhap many) VCs with enough capital to give the mediocre founder "a lot" somehow consistently missed the other founder's greatness. But, to the spirit of your question... 1/2
...as with most everything, it's a matter of degree. How great & how much money? Money can be an insane advantage, even if only for hiring greatness the next level down (leadership). A meaningful money advantage is just hard to beat save for extraordinarily rare greatness. 2/2
Also if your product is superior that means it cost less as well so less funding is required. Innovation is the key not the budget imho
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
