Founders worry too much about highly funded competitors. Usually funding matters less than the founders' ability. In the short term, a highly funded competitor can hurt you by e.g. lowering prices. But if you survive long enough, it will ultimately become a test of ability.
-
-
Don't you risk falling into a circular argument here - that the best founders are the founders that win, and they won because they're the best founders? What is the metric for best founders, if it's not winning? What would better founders who lost look like?
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.