So much of the outrage and argumentation I see online about various people's statements are a result of uncharitable interpretations.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1254086461483253760 …
Show this thread
-
I guess I'd think about it this way; either: A) Paul is somehow uniquely misinterpreted or a bad communicator. B) Paul is an extremely capable communicator, and opts to be controversial b/c he kinda likes it. I think we both know which one it is
Not uniquely perhaps, but people put a lot of energy into it. And I don't actually like being controversial. There is no upside to being dragged by a Twitter mob. But I'm not willing to shut up about something important in order to avoid it.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As I told Ross privately, my read is that you've take an oddly antagonistic position against many of the (fair, warranted) critiques of SV startup culture: wealth distribution, diversity & inclusion, fairness of opportunity vs. privilege of the old boys club, list goes on.
-
I don't know if you are/were biased by your own wealth, status, friend group, or by the people (like me) who worshipped you and everything you wrote/did/said... But I can't read your tweets & articles today w/o a feeling that there's an intentional missing of the big picture.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.