sad times
It used to be that if you wanted broad exposure for something, you'd try to publish it in a newspaper. Now all that would achieve is to hide it from most people behind a paywall.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is like those concert organizers who want to pay bands with exposure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very good point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Print is so 2000 and late!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are two reasons to submit an Op-Ed to a prestigious outlet like
@NYTimes,@WSJ or@FT: 1) The signal generated by you publishing something there. 2) Wanting a message to primarily reach other journalists or influence a certain type of political decision maker.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1244654069387534342 … -
"1) The signal generated by you publishing something there" Very important. The internet has an infinite amount of crap or mediocre info. Sorting the best from the rest is super-important.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Serious question, since you're in a better position to answer this than most: why has no one been able to crack the nut of micropayments?
-
Not economically sensible for news houses? Probably better suited for freelance/independent writers? Probably Medium will?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would consider buying/subscribing to a print paper a “paywall”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.