There is a long (longer?) list of media stories discussing the urgency of this PLUS all of the internal / professional warnings the White House received from their own experts (CDC, NIH etc.) This is a suspect tweet that likely won't age well...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
See this from January as typical of the genrehttps://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/now-trump-needs-deep-state-fight-coronavirus/605752/ …
-
-
It was published in MSM - why does it matter if a journalist wrote it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So it is unfair for a journalist to give an ignorant politician a hard time for not listening to an expert because the journalist was equally ignorant at the time?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lots of the stories in that image were OpEds, guest posts, and also not from journos. (Again, consider its source)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The 1st story top left form Wired -- the headline is misleading -- I wonder how many of the rest are. "We may be better off adjusting to a new normal of periodic outbreaks."https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-we-should-deescalate-the-war-on-the-coronavirus/ …
-
The KQED story is also nothing like the headline: "It's very difficult to know how deadly the novel coronavirus is because it's still very early in the outbreak. According to statistics published Feb 24 in JAMA, 2.3% of infected patients have died"https://www.kqed.org/science/1956289/the-flu-is-a-bigger-health-threat-in-the-u-s-than-novel-coronavirus …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.