That reporter had to read past the first paragraph, where I say "no one knows yet how much" the funding market would be affected, and ignore the "How much should you lower them? We don't know yet..." immediately after the quote she picked out.
-
-
Show this thread
-
It must have felt like walking through a minefield of truth to get hold of a quote she could misrepresent.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ha ha! The journalists clearly aren’t smart enough to understand the essay.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You said-1) valuations will be lower, 2) be flexible and 3) best not to raise in the environment if you can avoid it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfair to claim the entire paper is untrustworthy because on one reporters error.
-
This is not the first time the NYT has done this.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Often true that when reading journos on a subject I know well, my trust for news in general falls. Have to remember that reality, when reading things I do NOT know well. They are just as unreliable and absurd, I just don't know it.
-
Gell Mann amnesia
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The world today is overflowing with people that don't "do the homework" and just wing it. Clearly the author only skimmed your essay, if they read it at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.