None. Just greater frequency and longer routes and better WiFi is what’s shown to work
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Flying is valuable work and thinking time it’s also often a small proportion of the travel time And the best part . There may be a handful of routes “day trips” from SFO-Shanghai/LHR that this would have even the tiniest chance of making any sense.But cost not important anyway
Do you really think that if business travellers flying from Shanghai to LA can choose a 5 1/2 hour flight or a 12 hour flight, they'll choose the 12 hour flight?
-
-
Maybe if they use
@RocketripThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about slowing down the planes so it's more like 36 hours? I'd pay extra for all that great thinking/working time!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn’t the comparison . They could choose one of 3 daily departures for a suite on a plane vs one daily departure in economy seating ? Most would choose the longer one and sleep and work. First class it would be different
-
Most people will choose a 12 hour flight rather than a 5 1/2 hour one? If only Japan Airlines had realized that before they invested $10 million in Boom. The knots people will tie themselves in rather than admit they were mistaken...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is this a debate? All things equal, everyone would choose a shorter flight.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.