AI is misunderstood. It will primarily automate tasks, not eliminate jobs. This will generate a lot of demand for upskilling as employers struggle to find people to fill the jobs of the future. This is the big opportunity.
It would be an unusual technology that was powerful and yet didn't eliminate jobs. Most powerful technologies have. Not net, because they create new jobs too, but they usually do eliminate some.
-
-
biggest thing that overcomes inertia and drives adoption is cost saving (or fear of being driven out of business by those with lower costs) and people are _so_ expensive. Servers used to be expensive too... remember installing and maintaining actual hw? Ha, that was a passing fad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agree, my point is that for every job that is eliminated a new one is created, often within the same org. E.g. a cashier might shift from managing basic service Qs to being responsible for customer experience 1:1 interactions, which raises the bar for CX & requires upskilling.
-
Something like, For every action in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction but pertaining to the energy of people and economic expansion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11 often points to bank tellers and the invention of ATMs as a counterexampleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.