The counterintuitiveness of this principle, which is easily misrepresented as mere stupidity, is exactly what makes it so valuable.
Show this thread
The fact that "Move fast and break stuff" has been adopted by tech haters as a stick to beat tech with doesn't make it bad advice. It's the right thing to do in many situations.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What kind of situation would be a good example of that?
-
Early Facebook. It's just a social site. So who cares if someone ships a bug that takes the site down briefly?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Using this philosophy in building out my start-up insurance agency. The adage works...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When non-tech business owners set an impossibly short project calendar with a vague definition of the desired product there is no other development approach they can plausibly expect.
-
Responsible engineers should be courageous enough to speak out and negotiate success. It's in everyone's best interest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You can also never know what's "broken" until it breaks. trying to fix unbroken things is usually just reinventing the wheel
- Show replies
-
-
-
Isn't that how we ended up with 737 MAX?
-
Corollaries to "move fast and break things" are "assume it's going to break", "notice problems right away", "reward risk taking", and "make u-turns". Boeing knew it moved slowly and couldn't afford to change direction, so it ignored warning after warning. Speaking up was risky.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.