A million dollar question!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No because everyone would be part of several networks
-
I think what I just said is rather underapprecited. The minority rule makes one big network too susceptible to being dominated by the least tolerant ideas of the entire community
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We are the cause of this we can't blame single person or company
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our own nature, maximized in the form of recommendation algorithms is responsible for that. Facebook is just another brick on that wall
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd expect it's an open question, really. However -- leaving aside the polarisation question -- the disadvantages of centralisation among a small number of services seem to be clear: increased intrusion; walled gardens; higher barriers of entry for innovative alternatives; etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The verification of news quality should just sit as an independent layer to the social networks, to really work. Could be a startup!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg do you think it would be better?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think surveillance and behaviour modification would have been so easy if we were dealing with a bunch of different companies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Less centralized power if fragmented. But more polarization and fake news? Hard to say. Which parallels would be an example of that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.