It’s amazing the impact of these changes. My wish is to be able to standardise funding documentation across Europe.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1222804854193774592 …
-
-
It does, but it varies from country to country. Relatively straightforward in the UK, more complex elsewhere in Europe.
-
Thanks Jeff
Would a safe be eis compliant? And any important reason to choose safe over ASA? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I used a SAFE in Australia
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These need country by country adaptations unfortunately, esp considering tax events. Wouldn't even sure be so sure it works in America or just Delaware
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As you see from the comments it’s not straight forward but of course there is a way. The idea is to use a SAFE with very standard adjustments depending on country and maybe translation. I need to do more homework ...
-
In Denmark, we have a "Danish equivalent" called a Hatch document, I've used it both to fundraise and to invest with.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A common solution is to flip to a delaware topco and just use a vanilla SAFE (most of the growth funds at Series B+ will favour this kind of structure in any-case and it makes hiring US employees easier)
-
Good point re hiring in the US. It’s nice to be able to solve for that early on. I have had a nightmare with US options in the past.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
We ported the SAFE in Italy at the beginning of 2015. But the italian rules do not allow to fund a company without saying the equity value in case of bankruptcy, which is one of the goal of SAFE: not evaluate a startup at the beginning of its lifecycle.
-
Thanks for sharing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.