Awesome! Thank you for sharing this!
Interesting point in favor of carbon capture: it may simply be cheaper than decreasing emissions to zero in the fields where that would be hardest.https://cicero.oslo.no/no/posts/nyheter/carbon-capture-and-storage-is-necessary-to-keep-global-warming-below-2c …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
all solutions on deck
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Putting it in these terms now isn't an indication of a kind of smart contrarianism, you look like the kind of person who not only can't follow the science but possibly doesn't know what science is. If you can follow energy usage trends the basics shouldn't be beyond you.
End of conversation
-
-
-
What does one do at the age of 22 when one have many project ideas but their benefits can only be reaped if committed fully which takes a major portion of life?
@paulgThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm partial to designs of algal bioreactors to do carbon capture on coal fired power plants.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Carbon capture = passing the buck to our children.
-
Seems like a bandaid for sure but kicking the can down the road is net positive here, isn’t it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You're looking at the difference between geological and human timescales. Geologically speaking, the planet will re-balance and life will evolve that fits it. In human terms, we have a few years to act before we wipe out most of our own species.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.