Thesis: large tech companies are private property Antithesis: any entity with billions of users and not much competition becomes quasi-public, needs antitrust Synthesis: adversarial process repels future founders. Instead, could a state pay market price to acquire the company?
-
-
Agree. But that often happens with normal M&A too
I’m not a fan of antitrust, but if someone is *going* to do it then state M&A may be an alternative.
Gets more interesting if other states come in as bidders. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What if the state were simply the largest equity holder? It would be quite similar to the public markets and an IPO.
-
Sovereign wealth funds do this. I think we’ll see more. The general trend of tech companies becoming as large as states is accompanied by states starting to act like tech companies (Estonian digital residents, Chile startup visa, UK fintech sandbox).https://teleport.org/blog/2015/07/the-network-state/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They don't have to buy it to regulate it. They just need to cut it up or shut it down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gov & public would be better off with gov as early investor, IMHO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not to be pedantic, but what does “value” even mean here? no one cares about market cap of IRS or DEA. doesn’t value of a public org really mean utility to customers/users, net of externalities (+ or -)? if so, 95% might not be the right discount factor.
-
to be clear, I think there’s still a strong argument that a nationalized tech company turned utility wouldn’t provide nearly as much utility, but thinking in terms of equity value is the wrong heuristic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Another problem: Startup owned by state will erase most, if not all of their international footprint for obvious reasons!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bureaucrats running the former business (who possibly would be the original founders) could be rewarded according to arbitrary measures of success that are deemed good for society.
-
The arbitrary measures could still include profitability, but say at only 50% importance where customer satisfaction would be the other 50%.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.