One novel consequence of the new paywall model of journalism is that only your subscribers even see your articles. It used to be that when an important article was published in a national newspaper, everyone concerned had read it. Now only subscribers have.
-
-
And it is no longer possible to subscribe to just a couple of (national) newspapers and have most of the bases covered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The case for micropayments for online news content (per article or per day basis) seems pretty strong - would love to hear your thesis on why it hasn't taken off.
-
FWIW it’s the reality in China. WeChat allows publishers to accept micro payments for access to an article.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You can sub for like a buck or two then cancel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Far worse! You cannot share a screen. A library cannot subscribe for all their patrons. I learned to love the FT at SFPL when I was but a wee lad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Agreed! Love the idea. I'm surprised that's not part of the standard newspaper model.
End of conversation
-
-
-
True. A day pass, or cost per article, could make a lot of sense for the industry and its customers.
-
Watch this space.
@axate does both (pay-per-article with a cap - after you spend a certain amount the rest of the day is free... the more you read the better value you get).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
