Empirically, it seems the way to "avoid" work is to do kinds of work that don't feel like work to you. The prevalence of this strategy, from Bradman to Ramanujan, is evidence that you can't change the number of hours you need to put in, only what you call them.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
hard != long
-
not ≡ certainly, but →.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Just change your perception of what is "great" and maybe you will be happier.
-
That is indeed the usual solution.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You're far more likely to do great work collaborating effectively as part of a team.
-
Depends on the kind of work.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What does hard work look like?
-
Boring and repetitive, to an outside observer.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I can think of several example - for example, Poincare famously only worked a few hours every day. Same for GH Hardy. They were both obviously brilliant men and I don't think their experience necessarily generalizes, but, there you go.
-
Both worked about 4 hours. Keynes too: https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/869799183196336129 … There's a nice how-I-work style book about well known artists and writers that shows a huge variance, but a distinct peak around 4-ish hrs / day, often 6 or 7 days per week.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.