I have no idea how you could ever establish whether this is true, but for some reason I find it infuriating.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1205484320808480769 …
-
You can tell a story about anything. At least as plausible to say that most big innovations amount to a bunch of smaller simultaneous innovations.
That is an interesting point. Off the top of my head, the difference seems to be the time window. When I think of examples of things that entailed multiple, unrelated innovations, they're usually sequential. But if you make the time window long enough they become simultaneous.
