-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
«The plant utilises metal fuel to generate heat» Technically correct but a bit disingenuous, with "nuclear waste" only mentioned at the end of the piece.
-
Smart PR move to avoid the term nuclear (if it works).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
We can contain nuclear waste until technology enables us to eliminate it. Improved reactor designs will prevent or contain nuclear accidents. But we have no technology now or in beta that removes atmospheric carbon or stops runaway greenhouse effects.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Fission :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there any prototype built based on this technology? Small reactors are interesting but would love to see more details
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you wake have a blessed and beautiful Wednesday Paul











Here if you need me 



((((((Hugs))))))Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It looks like tip-toeing around the word “nuclear”, like this press release does, is necessary to promote gen IV reactors
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interview here: https://blog.ycombinator.com/jacob-dewitte-oklo-interview/ … I didn't find support for the claim that it "convert[s] nuclear waste to clean energy". Is this like the Integral Fast Reactor, but pyroprocessing plant is elsewhere? Don't like transporting waste for reprocessing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_fast_reactor …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.