In any other domain, no one feels the need for conspiracy theories to explain outliers. At anything else except making money, you can do extremely well by being talented, hard-working, and lucky. But anyone who does extremely well at making money must have cheated.
-
Show this thread
-
Incidentally, the VC business is the refutation of this view. If cheating were the way to make lots of money, VCs would select founders by looking for good cheaters. And that is definitely not the filter they use.
12 replies 15 retweets 217 likesShow this thread -
It's the diametric opposite of the filter Y Combinator used. We actively screened out applicants who seemed dishonest. It not only didn't hurt us; it helped us.
7 replies 12 retweets 207 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @socialimpactvc @ImpCapital
2/5000 = .04%. Seems like a pretty good filter to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
The reason we tell companies to grow is that that's the only way to tell if you're doing the right thing with the product. Growth is a compass. YC's purpose is to help founders get their companies going, not to supply you with vetted leads.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.