In any other domain, no one feels the need for conspiracy theories to explain outliers. At anything else except making money, you can do extremely well by being talented, hard-working, and lucky. But anyone who does extremely well at making money must have cheated.
-
-
So not only is the conspiracy theory of wealth false, but you can get rich by disproving it.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some view “hacking” as cheating because they abide by rules that don’t actually exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Much of today’s super wealth is down to exploiting oligopoly and/or network effects. This form of “cheating” doesn’t require “dishonesty”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
2/5000 = .04%. Seems like a pretty good filter to me.
- Show replies
-
-
-
What makes an applicant seem dishonest? Where would Jobs and Woz making a device to defraud phone companies fall in your filter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's great you actively screen, but how can you do that well when FBI experts say they do a smidge better than 50/50 in detecting liars? (source: "What Every Body is Saying")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mentioning a fictitious work-experience is dishonest. That is an easy one. Is saying 'yes' to a strict deadline (without having all the details of how you will meet it) dishonesty? Somewhere there is a thin line. Can you please share your detailed thoughts?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.