Maybe. I think in 25 years nothing will be substantially different with the environment, and all people will have to do is point to the hysteria we see today as proof we were a little too over-zealous.
Eventually this is going to cause a reaction like a stretched rubber band snapping when let go.https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1192863800363499520 …
-
-
-
Eh. The migration crisis in Europe was in large part due to civil unrest caused by famine caused by drought caused by climate change. The hysteria isn't unwarranted; however, I think the right answer is changing the Earth's albedo via aerosols, like how Krakatoa changed climate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
beware those who desire the snap.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What does that mean?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The q’s used to determine basic scientific literacy have nothing to do with climate science proficiency. Also, when you understand climate science and the implications on the environment it (sadly) makes remaining a US conservative (read: republican) a non-starter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet 97% of scientist believe CC is caused by human carbon dioxide emissions.
-
That statement is probably untrue. The claim has always been: 97% of climate scientists.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shows you right there that they aren’t even looking at the same “facts”. They only seek out the “facts” that confirm their beliefs. Good example of how almost everything works these days and why real facts are becoming irrelevant, which is extremely dangerous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Global Warming is this era’s Original Sin.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.