If you have something important to say, it's wrong to say it in a publication covered in enormous ads, autoplay videos, and pop-ups.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1172434260176732161 …
-
ok, so what's the solution then? how do you think people should get paid?
I didn't say there shouldn't be paywalls, just that it was irresponsible to put an important message behind one. If People magazine or Car and Driver wanted to put all their articles behind a paywall, that would be fine. Even most NYT articles.
-
-
How would you define important message?
-
I think
@lindseyadler ‘s extensive reporting on Gio Urshela is very important and should be disseminated to the US populace for all to consume. (ps I’m an Athletic subscriber)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Since the beginning of time you had a paywall to buy your news
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.