It's not always a good idea to "reinvent the wheel," but it's a good idea more often than it's recommended (which is never).
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you're on the side of the new paradigm that is replacing the older paradigms, in a Thomas Kuhn kind-of sense, then that irresponsibility is vitally important exactly because the old paradigm will fight for survival and try to convince supports of the new way that it wont work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Mostly I'm curious how often it ends up working out for people, vs falling into re-inventing the wheel traps. I think people tend to go far deeper into the real issues while doing this—may just be a premature optimization though: if you don't actually need the depth it's a waste
End of conversation
-
-
-
Apparently more than one Nobel prizewinner physically avoided Feynman because they couldn't stand him deriving their work from first principles on the way to proving something else....
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
When I read A Short History of Nearly Everything, I was hoping to understand HOW scientists made their discoveries. Accepting scientific CONCLUSIONS at face value kinda defeats the purpose of the scientific method. The process matters more than the outcomes.
-
I loved that book for the same reason. And I love how it brings seemingly magical discoveries within reach of anyone. Want to know the diameter of the Earth? Here's an easy way to measure it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Easier said than done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From Taleb’s “Only the autodidacts are free.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.