If you compare funding offers not by valuation but by the amount of the company you have left afterward (which is what actually matters), you'll be less tempted by higher valuations.
-
-
If you have an offer at a somewhat lower valuation from an investor you like a lot more, take that one.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So 36% of $10m is not as much different as 38% of $20m valuation?
-
It's the same company in both cases, and 38% of it is only 1/18 more than 36% of it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t get it: $10m valuation you get 36% $20m valuation you get 38% Why would you rather 36% than 38% if you’re still just getting $1m?
-
All other things being equal, you'd rather have 38% of course. But the two aren't that different, so if all other things aren't equal, you might prefer deals in which you get 36%.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If someone doesn't realize this at the outset, I can't imagine how well they'd do running a company
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The more diluted the founders’ shares, the less important the valuation differential is. If a founder had only 5% ownership, in your example his post would be 5.50% versus 5.75%! Maybe not worth the hassle!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lu_naganawa@arturtavr matemática simples mas não trivial.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@readwiseio save thread -
Done! We've saved this whole thread to your Readwise library so that you can revisit/remember it

End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.