I was surprised by that too... I thought @TheEconomist's editors were literate enough to know the difference.
On the other hand, they did comment that "for whom, the bell tolls" last year: https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2018/03/03/in-the-court-of-common-usage-an-old-pronoun-is-losing-its-case …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lamely pandering to its American audience
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
poor whom
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Economist may have sacrificed it to get this very reaction. People are talking about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d guess it was their priests doing it. But they might have delegated the actual sacrificing to another team. Hard to say who, exactly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blindly guessing about Maya culture 1,000 years ago and selling subscriptions on the back of it deserves such a shoddy title.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.