When I meet startups I ask them questions. But I could see that format would be a problem if we'd scheduled an hour-long meeting and I knew after 10 minutes that I didn't want to invest. I'd have to keep making up questions for another 50 minutes.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Whereas if the default format is founder-explains-slides, the investor can switch into investor-asks-questions mode at will, whenever they're sufficiently interested.
Show this thread -
If this theory is correct, the conventional investor meeting begins in failure mode. I wonder how many founders dutifully walk investors through their deck, thinking they're doing a good job, and never realize the meeting began in failure mode and never left it.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Prototype is the only way to go then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a legacy process, with no widely accepted alternative. Super common in all industries.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed. Presumably it’s still okay to send a deck upfront for investors to read through?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Great point
End of conversation
-
-
-
Person dependant no? 6 page pre-meeting memo seems to work amazing for Amazon but would be tough for me as I tend to be more visual.
-
That said, do the means really matter that much if the content is good? Maybe also more about delivery?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.