The answer to this is probably the same boring answer that so often explains great successes: it wasn't something structurally novel about the Harry Potter books, but simply that Rowling did a great job writing them.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @paulg @asteroid_saku
That said, there is something structurally novel about them: they're a way to bring back the boarding school story (once wildly popular in England) for an audience that doesn't consist of boarding school students.
6 replies 2 retweets 96 likes -
Replying to @paulg @asteroid_saku
Also: Randomness. There must be hundreds of novels better than Harry Potter series that never made it big.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @BurakYngn @asteroid_saku
As someone who is constantly scouring bookshelves for good books for 7-10 year olds, I can say this is false, at least as regards published novels.
4:03 AM - 28 Jun 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.