Hypothesis: Although some newspapers can survive the switch to online subscriptions, none can do it and remain a politically neutral "newspaper of record." You have to pick a side to get people to subscribe.pic.twitter.com/bWNZzYFzFJ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Right now, online subscriptions have enough lock-in to balance entertainment/enragement and education. Low-friction payments might indeed lead to even stronger entertainization of news.
Bingo (based on my experience at Substack)
Pulling in search results is probably important, but it seems like satisfying the current readership is probably more so.
Partisan is one form of sensationalism. Any will do. In order to get picked for distribution (by the feeds), it has to be sprinkled with sensationalism sugar, which leaves us all hooked on content junk food. Solution = get back to publishers delivering directly to audience.
However if most publications eventually adopt a single sign-on, low friction, per-article payment system, then it could allow journalism to go back to neutral.
Non partisan news will never exist again because "the scoop" has become a commodity. "The take" has replaced it as the draw to publications. The problem is the take is projection and the scoop is observation. Projections are far more prone to bias.
Sorry to hear that “nazis and racism are bad” is too partisan for ya
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.