You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Hypothesis: Although some newspapers can survive the switch to online subscriptions, none can do it and remain a politically neutral "newspaper of record." You have to pick a side to get people to subscribe.pic.twitter.com/bWNZzYFzFJ
One encouraging possibility: If the root of the problem is that subscribing is so high-friction that only passionate supporters have the energy to do it, then lower-friction payment methods could cause a return to more politically neutral journalism.
If the root of the problem is that you need partisan articles to draw people from Twitter into the top of your funnel, though, then lower-friction payment methods won't help, and in fact might make things worse.
how did you collected the data?
It would take a @brave startup to try the experiment
@DarioTepoTec @iamjesly we discussed this during the #Lightninghackdaymuc
Yes,I enjoyed that discussion very much because it is a big pain for myself. Hoping new types of content validation systems along with monetization approaches would solve this pain.The company I mentioned during our discussion is pivoting to debate -https://twitter.com/iam_preethi/status/1135615837698551808?s=20 …
Is non-biased journalism even possible?
Yes, neutral journalism is costly. Journalists are people; people are not neutral. Occasionally, individual people will change their bias, but that's costly (and often difficult in spite of the cost).
IMHO, the polarization causality is important. I think, the right got to express themselves thanks to low friction(& cost) social media, and found they are big together. Focusing left to go more extreme to counter them. So what if the *cost* to publish gets back to high?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
